Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
STA 13 Apr 08:30 am MSA

Lineup Out

Junction Oval
Melbourne T10 Invitational

Best Player Combinations For
STA vs MSA

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

STA vs MSA

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best STA Player Combinations

Best STA Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
T Gray BOW STA
R Ayre AR STA
P Francis AR STA
C Anderson BOW STA
R Hicks WK STA
C ORiordan BOW STA
R Kingsell BAT STA
Yuvraj Sharma BAT STA
Angus McTaggart AR STA
Bailey Abela BAT STA
B Nikitaras BAT STA
T Gray
R Ayre
P Francis
C Anderson
R Hicks
C ORiordan
R Kingsell
Yuvraj Sharma
Angus McTaggart
Bailey Abela
B Nikitaras
1
1 player
T Gray
2 player
T Gray
Strong Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
T Gray
2 player
R Ayre
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
T Gray
2 player
P Francis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
T Gray
2 player
C Anderson
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
T Gray
2 player
R Hicks
Positive Correlation
0.64
1 player
T Gray
2 player
C ORiordan
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
T Gray
2 player
R Kingsell
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Gray
2 player
Yuvraj Sharma
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
T Gray
2 player
Angus McTaggart
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
T Gray
2 player
Bailey Abela
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
T Gray
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
0.58
1 player
R Ayre
2 player
T Gray
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Ayre
2 player
R Ayre
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Ayre
2 player
P Francis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
R Ayre
2 player
C Anderson
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
R Ayre
2 player
R Hicks
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
R Ayre
2 player
C ORiordan
Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
R Ayre
2 player
R Kingsell
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
R Ayre
2 player
Yuvraj Sharma
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
R Ayre
2 player
Angus McTaggart
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Ayre
2 player
Bailey Abela
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
R Ayre
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
P Francis
2 player
T Gray
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
P Francis
2 player
R Ayre
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Francis
2 player
P Francis
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
P Francis
2 player
C Anderson
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
P Francis
2 player
R Hicks
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
P Francis
2 player
C ORiordan
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
P Francis
2 player
R Kingsell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
P Francis
2 player
Yuvraj Sharma
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
P Francis
2 player
Angus McTaggart
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
P Francis
2 player
Bailey Abela
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
P Francis
2 player
B Nikitaras
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
C Anderson
2 player
T Gray
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Anderson
2 player
R Ayre
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
C Anderson
2 player
P Francis
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Anderson
2 player
C Anderson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
C Anderson
2 player
R Hicks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
C Anderson
2 player
C ORiordan
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
C Anderson
2 player
R Kingsell
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Anderson
2 player
Yuvraj Sharma
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
C Anderson
2 player
Angus McTaggart
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Anderson
2 player
Bailey Abela
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Anderson
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
R Hicks
2 player
T Gray
Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
R Hicks
2 player
R Ayre
Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
R Hicks
2 player
P Francis
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
R Hicks
2 player
C Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Hicks
2 player
R Hicks
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
R Hicks
2 player
C ORiordan
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
R Hicks
2 player
R Kingsell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Hicks
2 player
Yuvraj Sharma
Weak Positive Correlation
0.64
1 player
R Hicks
2 player
Angus McTaggart
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Hicks
2 player
Bailey Abela
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
R Hicks
2 player
B Nikitaras
Weak Positive Correlation
0.64
1 player
C ORiordan
2 player
T Gray
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
C ORiordan
2 player
R Ayre
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
C ORiordan
2 player
P Francis
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
C ORiordan
2 player
C Anderson
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
C ORiordan
2 player
R Hicks
No Correlation
1
1 player
C ORiordan
2 player
C ORiordan
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C ORiordan
2 player
R Kingsell
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
C ORiordan
2 player
Yuvraj Sharma
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
C ORiordan
2 player
Angus McTaggart
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
C ORiordan
2 player
Bailey Abela
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
C ORiordan
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
R Kingsell
2 player
T Gray
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
R Kingsell
2 player
R Ayre
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
R Kingsell
2 player
P Francis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
R Kingsell
2 player
C Anderson
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
R Kingsell
2 player
R Hicks
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Kingsell
2 player
C ORiordan
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Kingsell
2 player
R Kingsell
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
R Kingsell
2 player
Yuvraj Sharma
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
R Kingsell
2 player
Angus McTaggart
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
R Kingsell
2 player
Bailey Abela
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
R Kingsell
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
Yuvraj Sharma
2 player
T Gray
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
Yuvraj Sharma
2 player
R Ayre
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
Yuvraj Sharma
2 player
P Francis
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
Yuvraj Sharma
2 player
C Anderson
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
Yuvraj Sharma
2 player
R Hicks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
Yuvraj Sharma
2 player
C ORiordan
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
Yuvraj Sharma
2 player
R Kingsell
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Yuvraj Sharma
2 player
Yuvraj Sharma
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
Yuvraj Sharma
2 player
Angus McTaggart
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
Yuvraj Sharma
2 player
Bailey Abela
Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
Yuvraj Sharma
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
Angus McTaggart
2 player
T Gray
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
Angus McTaggart
2 player
R Ayre
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
Angus McTaggart
2 player
P Francis
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
Angus McTaggart
2 player
C Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.64
1 player
Angus McTaggart
2 player
R Hicks
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
Angus McTaggart
2 player
C ORiordan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
Angus McTaggart
2 player
R Kingsell
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
Angus McTaggart
2 player
Yuvraj Sharma
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Angus McTaggart
2 player
Angus McTaggart
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
Angus McTaggart
2 player
Bailey Abela
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
Angus McTaggart
2 player
B Nikitaras
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
Bailey Abela
2 player
T Gray
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
Bailey Abela
2 player
R Ayre
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
Bailey Abela
2 player
P Francis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
Bailey Abela
2 player
C Anderson
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
Bailey Abela
2 player
R Hicks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
Bailey Abela
2 player
C ORiordan
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
Bailey Abela
2 player
R Kingsell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
Bailey Abela
2 player
Yuvraj Sharma
Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
Bailey Abela
2 player
Angus McTaggart
No Correlation
1
1 player
Bailey Abela
2 player
Bailey Abela
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
Bailey Abela
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
T Gray
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
R Ayre
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
P Francis
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
C Anderson
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
R Hicks
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
C ORiordan
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
R Kingsell
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
Yuvraj Sharma
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
Angus McTaggart
Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
Bailey Abela
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
B Nikitaras
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick T Gray and C ORiordan together
Positive Correlation

Pick R Hicks and Angus McTaggart together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 B Nikitaras

BAT
Similar Perfomance
Angus McTaggart 0.5
P Francis 0.32
R Hicks 0.22
R Ayre 0.15
Yuvraj Sharma 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
C ORiordan -0.16
R Kingsell -0.12
Bailey Abela -0.12
T Gray -0.05

2 Angus McTaggart

AR
Similar Perfomance
R Hicks 0.64
B Nikitaras 0.5
R Ayre 0.34
T Gray 0.3
Yuvraj Sharma 0.28
C Anderson 0.24
C ORiordan 0.2
P Francis 0.1
R Kingsell 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
Bailey Abela -0.12

3 R Hicks

WK
Similar Perfomance
Angus McTaggart 0.64
R Ayre 0.52
T Gray 0.4
C Anderson 0.37
Yuvraj Sharma 0.35
Bailey Abela 0.25
R Kingsell 0.22
B Nikitaras 0.22
C ORiordan 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
P Francis -0.08

4 T Gray

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C ORiordan 0.64
R Ayre 0.58
R Hicks 0.4
P Francis 0.34
Angus McTaggart 0.3
Yuvraj Sharma 0.28
C Anderson 0.18
Bailey Abela 0.17
R Kingsell 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
B Nikitaras -0.05

5 C Anderson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
Yuvraj Sharma 0.47
R Hicks 0.37
Angus McTaggart 0.24
T Gray 0.18
Bailey Abela 0.1
R Ayre 0.07
C ORiordan 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
P Francis -0.08
R Kingsell -0.08

Best MSA Player Combinations

Best MSA Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
S Harper WK MSA
R Mark AR MSA
T Fraser Rogers BAT MSA
A Anlezark BOW MSA
C Howe AR MSA
H hoekstra BOW MSA
Jack Czosnek AR MSA
J Merlo AR MSA
S Elliot BOW MSA
C Kellaway BAT MSA
L Blackford WK MSA
S Harper
R Mark
T Fraser Rogers
A Anlezark
C Howe
H hoekstra
Jack Czosnek
J Merlo
S Elliot
C Kellaway
L Blackford
1
1 player
S Harper
2 player
S Harper
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
S Harper
2 player
R Mark
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Harper
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
S Harper
2 player
A Anlezark
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
S Harper
2 player
C Howe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Harper
2 player
H hoekstra
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Harper
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Harper
2 player
J Merlo
Weak Negative Correlation
0.32
1 player
S Harper
2 player
S Elliot
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
S Harper
2 player
C Kellaway
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Harper
2 player
L Blackford
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
R Mark
2 player
S Harper
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Mark
2 player
R Mark
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
R Mark
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Mark
2 player
A Anlezark
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
R Mark
2 player
C Howe
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
R Mark
2 player
H hoekstra
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
R Mark
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Mark
2 player
J Merlo
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Mark
2 player
S Elliot
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
R Mark
2 player
C Kellaway
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Mark
2 player
L Blackford
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
R Mark
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
A Anlezark
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
C Howe
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.77
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
H hoekstra
Negative Correlation
-0.45
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Negative Correlation
-0.04
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
J Merlo
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
S Elliot
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
C Kellaway
No Correlation
0.9
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
L Blackford
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
R Mark
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
A Anlezark
Strong Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
C Howe
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
H hoekstra
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
J Merlo
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
S Elliot
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
C Kellaway
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
L Blackford
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
C Howe
2 player
S Harper
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
C Howe
2 player
R Mark
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Howe
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Weak Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
C Howe
2 player
A Anlezark
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Howe
2 player
C Howe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
C Howe
2 player
H hoekstra
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Howe
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Howe
2 player
J Merlo
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Howe
2 player
S Elliot
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Howe
2 player
C Kellaway
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Howe
2 player
L Blackford
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
R Mark
Positive Correlation
-0.77
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
A Anlezark
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
C Howe
No Correlation
1
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
H hoekstra
Strong Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
J Merlo
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
S Elliot
Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
C Kellaway
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
L Blackford
Weak Negative Correlation
0.28
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
S Harper
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
R Mark
Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
A Anlezark
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
C Howe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
H hoekstra
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Strong Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
J Merlo
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
S Elliot
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
C Kellaway
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
L Blackford
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
S Harper
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
R Mark
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
A Anlezark
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
C Howe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
H hoekstra
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
J Merlo
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
S Elliot
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
C Kellaway
Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
L Blackford
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
S Harper
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
R Mark
Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
A Anlezark
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
C Howe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
H hoekstra
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
J Merlo
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
S Elliot
Strong Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
C Kellaway
Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
L Blackford
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
R Mark
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
A Anlezark
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
C Howe
Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
H hoekstra
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
J Merlo
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
S Elliot
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
C Kellaway
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
L Blackford
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
S Harper
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
R Mark
No Correlation
0.9
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
A Anlezark
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
C Howe
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
H hoekstra
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
Jack Czosnek
No Correlation
0.57
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
J Merlo
Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
S Elliot
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
C Kellaway
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
L Blackford
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick R Mark and A Anlezark together
Positive Correlation

Pick R Mark and J Merlo together
Positive Correlation

Pick R Mark and C Kellaway together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Fraser Rogers and L Blackford together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick A Anlezark and J Merlo together
Positive Correlation

Pick Jack Czosnek and J Merlo together
Positive Correlation

Don’t pick T Fraser Rogers and H hoekstra in the same lineup
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Harper

WK
Similar Perfomance
S Elliot 0.32
Jack Czosnek 0.28
C Howe 0.27
L Blackford 0.2
T Fraser Rogers 0.14
H hoekstra 0.14
A Anlezark 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
R Mark -0.3
J Merlo -0.25
C Kellaway -0.06

2 T Fraser Rogers

BAT
Similar Perfomance
L Blackford 0.9
C Howe 0.28
A Anlezark 0.18
S Harper 0.14
C Kellaway 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
H hoekstra -0.77
Jack Czosnek -0.45
R Mark -0.17
J Merlo -0.04
S Elliot -0.02

3 C Kellaway

BAT
Similar Perfomance
R Mark 0.62
C Howe 0.47
Jack Czosnek 0.45
S Elliot 0.44
J Merlo 0.42
A Anlezark 0.13
H hoekstra 0.07
T Fraser Rogers 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
L Blackford -0.1
S Harper -0.06

4 S Elliot

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Kellaway 0.44
R Mark 0.42
A Anlezark 0.42
H hoekstra 0.42
J Merlo 0.34
S Harper 0.32
Jack Czosnek 0.25
C Howe 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
L Blackford -0.03
T Fraser Rogers -0.02

5 H hoekstra

BOW
Similar Perfomance
Jack Czosnek 0.52
S Elliot 0.42
R Mark 0.4
J Merlo 0.24
A Anlezark 0.23
S Harper 0.14
C Kellaway 0.07
C Howe 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
T Fraser Rogers -0.77
L Blackford -0.23

Best STA Player Combinations

Best STA Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

High Performing Players

Best MSA Player Combinations

Best MSA Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
S Harper WK MSA
R Mark AR MSA
T Fraser Rogers BAT MSA
A Anlezark BOW MSA
C Howe AR MSA
H hoekstra BOW MSA
Jack Czosnek AR MSA
J Merlo AR MSA
S Elliot BOW MSA
C Kellaway BAT MSA
L Blackford WK MSA
S Harper
R Mark
T Fraser Rogers
A Anlezark
C Howe
H hoekstra
Jack Czosnek
J Merlo
S Elliot
C Kellaway
L Blackford
1
1 player
S Harper
2 player
S Harper
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Harper
2 player
R Mark
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Harper
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Harper
2 player
A Anlezark
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Harper
2 player
C Howe
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Harper
2 player
H hoekstra
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Harper
2 player
Jack Czosnek
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
S Harper
2 player
J Merlo
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Harper
2 player
S Elliot
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Harper
2 player
C Kellaway
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Harper
2 player
L Blackford
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Mark
2 player
S Harper
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Mark
2 player
R Mark
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Mark
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Mark
2 player
A Anlezark
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Mark
2 player
C Howe
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Mark
2 player
H hoekstra
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Mark
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Mark
2 player
J Merlo
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
R Mark
2 player
S Elliot
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Mark
2 player
C Kellaway
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Mark
2 player
L Blackford
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
R Mark
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
A Anlezark
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
C Howe
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
H hoekstra
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
J Merlo
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
S Elliot
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
C Kellaway
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
L Blackford
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
S Harper
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
R Mark
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
A Anlezark
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
C Howe
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
H hoekstra
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
J Merlo
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
S Elliot
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
C Kellaway
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Anlezark
2 player
L Blackford
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Howe
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Howe
2 player
R Mark
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Howe
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Howe
2 player
A Anlezark
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Howe
2 player
C Howe
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Howe
2 player
H hoekstra
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Howe
2 player
Jack Czosnek
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Howe
2 player
J Merlo
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Howe
2 player
S Elliot
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Howe
2 player
C Kellaway
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
C Howe
2 player
L Blackford
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
R Mark
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
A Anlezark
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
C Howe
No Correlation
1
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
H hoekstra
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
J Merlo
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
S Elliot
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
C Kellaway
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H hoekstra
2 player
L Blackford
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
R Mark
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
A Anlezark
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
C Howe
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
H hoekstra
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
J Merlo
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
S Elliot
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
C Kellaway
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
Jack Czosnek
2 player
L Blackford
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
S Harper
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
R Mark
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
A Anlezark
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
C Howe
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
H hoekstra
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
J Merlo
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
S Elliot
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
C Kellaway
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
J Merlo
2 player
L Blackford
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
R Mark
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
A Anlezark
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
C Howe
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
H hoekstra
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
J Merlo
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
S Elliot
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
C Kellaway
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Elliot
2 player
L Blackford
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
R Mark
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
A Anlezark
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
C Howe
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
H hoekstra
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
J Merlo
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
S Elliot
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
C Kellaway
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
C Kellaway
2 player
L Blackford
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
S Harper
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
R Mark
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
A Anlezark
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
C Howe
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
H hoekstra
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
Jack Czosnek
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
J Merlo
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
S Elliot
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
C Kellaway
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Blackford
2 player
L Blackford
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick S Harper and R Mark together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Harper and J Merlo together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Anlezark and C Kellaway together
Negative Correlation

Pick H hoekstra and L Blackford together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Harper

WK
Similar Perfomance
T Fraser Rogers 0.14
H hoekstra 0.14
S Elliot 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
R Mark -0.7
J Merlo -0.67
A Anlezark -0.35
L Blackford -0.23
C Kellaway -0.14

2 S Elliot

BOW
Similar Perfomance
H hoekstra 0.35
S Harper 0.14
J Merlo 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
R Mark -0.42
Jack Czosnek -0.35
T Fraser Rogers -0.33
C Howe -0.33
L Blackford -0.23
C Kellaway -0.14

3 T Fraser Rogers

BAT
Similar Perfomance
L Blackford 0.7
C Howe 0.33
S Harper 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
H hoekstra -0.7
J Merlo -0.42
Jack Czosnek -0.35
S Elliot -0.33
R Mark -0.14
C Kellaway -0.14

4 C Kellaway

BAT
Similar Perfomance
C Howe 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
A Anlezark -0.7
Jack Czosnek -0.35
L Blackford -0.35
S Harper -0.14
T Fraser Rogers -0.14
J Merlo -0.14
S Elliot -0.14

5 L Blackford

WK
Similar Perfomance
T Fraser Rogers 0.7
A Anlezark 0.23
J Merlo 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
H hoekstra -0.7
C Howe -0.35
C Kellaway -0.35
S Harper -0.23
Jack Czosnek -0.23
S Elliot -0.23

More on PL Labs

STA vs MSA

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only