Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
NOR-W 01 Apr 02:30 am SOU-W

Lineup Out

Bert Sutcliffe Oval
New Zealand Womens OD

Best Player Combinations For
NOR-W vs SOU-W

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

NOR-W vs SOU-W

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best NOR-W Player Combinations

Best NOR-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

No data found

Best SOU-W Player Combinations

Best SOU-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Browning AR SOU-W
L KotKamp BOW SOU-W
J Simmons BOW SOU-W
M Banks AR SOU-W
E Carson BOW SOU-W
C Blakely BAT SOU-W
H Jensen AR SOU-W
E Black BOW SOU-W
O Gain WK SOU-W
P Inglis WK SOU-W
P Watkins BAT SOU-W
A Browning
L KotKamp
J Simmons
M Banks
E Carson
C Blakely
H Jensen
E Black
O Gain
P Inglis
P Watkins
1
1 player
A Browning
2 player
A Browning
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Browning
2 player
L KotKamp
Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
A Browning
2 player
J Simmons
Strong Negative Correlation
0.15
1 player
A Browning
2 player
M Banks
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Carson
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Browning
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Browning
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
A Browning
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
A Browning
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Browning
2 player
P Watkins
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
L KotKamp
2 player
A Browning
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L KotKamp
2 player
L KotKamp
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L KotKamp
2 player
J Simmons
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L KotKamp
2 player
M Banks
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
L KotKamp
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
-0.55
1 player
L KotKamp
2 player
C Blakely
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L KotKamp
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Negative Correlation
0.15
1 player
L KotKamp
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
L KotKamp
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L KotKamp
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
L KotKamp
2 player
P Watkins
Weak Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
A Browning
Strong Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
L KotKamp
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
J Simmons
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
M Banks
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
E Carson
Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
E Black
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
O Gain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
P Watkins
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Banks
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Banks
2 player
L KotKamp
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Banks
2 player
J Simmons
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Banks
2 player
M Banks
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Banks
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
M Banks
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Banks
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Banks
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Banks
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Banks
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
M Banks
2 player
P Watkins
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Carson
2 player
A Browning
Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
E Carson
2 player
L KotKamp
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
E Carson
2 player
J Simmons
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Carson
2 player
M Banks
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Carson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
E Carson
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Carson
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
E Carson
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Carson
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Carson
2 player
P Watkins
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
A Browning
Positive Correlation
-0.55
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
L KotKamp
Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
J Simmons
Weak Negative Correlation
0.55
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
M Banks
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Blakely
Strong Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
H Jensen
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Watkins
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
L KotKamp
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
J Simmons
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
M Banks
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Blakely
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
H Jensen
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Watkins
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
E Black
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
E Black
2 player
L KotKamp
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
E Black
2 player
J Simmons
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Black
2 player
M Banks
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Carson
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Black
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
E Black
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Black
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
E Black
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
E Black
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
E Black
2 player
P Watkins
Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
O Gain
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
O Gain
2 player
L KotKamp
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
J Simmons
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
O Gain
2 player
M Banks
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0
1 player
O Gain
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
O Gain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Watkins
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
L KotKamp
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
J Simmons
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
M Banks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Inglis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Watkins
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
L KotKamp
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
J Simmons
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
M Banks
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
E Carson
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Watkins
2 player
P Watkins
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A Browning and E Carson together
Positive Correlation

Pick L KotKamp and J Simmons together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick L KotKamp and O Gain together
Positive Correlation

Pick L KotKamp and P Inglis together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Simmons and O Gain together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick M Banks and H Jensen together
Positive Correlation

Pick E Carson and E Black together
Positive Correlation

Pick E Carson and P Watkins together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Blakely and H Jensen together
Strong Positive Correlation

Don’t pick A Browning and J Simmons in the same lineup
Strong Negative Correlation

Don’t pick J Simmons and E Carson in the same lineup
Negative Correlation

Don’t pick J Simmons and E Black in the same lineup
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 A Browning

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Carson 0.7
C Blakely 0.4
E Black 0.35
P Watkins 0.35
H Jensen 0.2
M Banks 0.15
Opposite Perfomance
J Simmons -1
L KotKamp -0.5
P Inglis -0.2
O Gain -0.15

2 C Blakely

BAT
Similar Perfomance
H Jensen 0.85
M Banks 0.55
A Browning 0.4
E Carson 0.35
P Watkins 0.35
Opposite Perfomance
L KotKamp -0.55
J Simmons -0.4
O Gain -0.2
P Inglis -0.15

3 E Carson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Browning 0.7
E Black 0.7
P Watkins 0.7
C Blakely 0.35
M Banks 0.2
H Jensen 0.2
P Inglis 0.2
O Gain 0.15
Opposite Perfomance
J Simmons -0.7
L KotKamp -0.15

4 H Jensen

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Blakely 0.85
M Banks 0.7
P Watkins 0.5
A Browning 0.2
E Carson 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
L KotKamp -0.35
E Black -0.15

5 M Banks

AR
Similar Perfomance
H Jensen 0.7
C Blakely 0.55
P Watkins 0.55
J Simmons 0.4
O Gain 0.4
P Inglis 0.3
E Carson 0.2
A Browning 0.15
Opposite Perfomance
E Black -0.2

Best NOR-W Player Combinations

Best NOR-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
F Devonshire BOW NOR-W
E McLeod BAT NOR-W
J Watkin BAT NOR-W
H Rowe AR NOR-W
S Shahri BAT NOR-W
A Hucker BOW NOR-W
J Kerr BOW NOR-W
N Patel AR NOR-W
K Gaging WK NOR-W
O Bartlett BOW NOR-W
J Penfold AR NOR-W
F Devonshire
E McLeod
J Watkin
H Rowe
S Shahri
A Hucker
J Kerr
N Patel
K Gaging
O Bartlett
J Penfold
1
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
F Devonshire
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
E McLeod
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
J Watkin
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
A Hucker
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
J Kerr
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
N Patel
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
O Bartlett
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
1
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
E McLeod
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
J Watkin
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
H Rowe
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
S Shahri
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
A Hucker
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
J Kerr
No Correlation
0
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
N Patel
No Correlation
0
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
0
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
F Devonshire
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
E McLeod
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
J Watkin
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
A Hucker
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
J Kerr
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
N Patel
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
K Gaging
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
O Bartlett
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
J Penfold
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
E McLeod
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
J Watkin
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
H Rowe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
A Hucker
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
J Kerr
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
N Patel
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
J Penfold
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
E McLeod
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
J Watkin
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
H Rowe
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
S Shahri
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
A Hucker
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
J Kerr
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
N Patel
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
J Penfold
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
F Devonshire
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
E McLeod
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
J Watkin
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
H Rowe
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
S Shahri
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
A Hucker
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
J Kerr
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
N Patel
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
O Bartlett
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Hucker
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
F Devonshire
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
E McLeod
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
J Watkin
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
A Hucker
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
J Kerr
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
N Patel
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
K Gaging
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
O Bartlett
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Kerr
2 player
J Penfold
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Patel
2 player
F Devonshire
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Patel
2 player
E McLeod
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Patel
2 player
J Watkin
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
N Patel
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Patel
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Patel
2 player
A Hucker
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Patel
2 player
J Kerr
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
N Patel
2 player
N Patel
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Patel
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Patel
2 player
O Bartlett
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Patel
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
F Devonshire
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
E McLeod
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
J Watkin
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
A Hucker
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
J Kerr
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
N Patel
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
K Gaging
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
O Bartlett
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
F Devonshire
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
E McLeod
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
J Watkin
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
A Hucker
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
J Kerr
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
N Patel
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
K Gaging
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
O Bartlett
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
J Penfold
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
F Devonshire
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
E McLeod
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
J Watkin
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
H Rowe
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
A Hucker
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
J Kerr
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
N Patel
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
O Bartlett
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick F Devonshire and A Hucker together
Positive Correlation

Pick F Devonshire and N Patel together
Positive Correlation

Pick F Devonshire and K Gaging together
Positive Correlation

Pick F Devonshire and J Penfold together
Positive Correlation

Pick E McLeod and A Hucker together
Positive Correlation

Pick E McLeod and J Penfold together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Watkin and J Kerr together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Watkin and O Bartlett together
Positive Correlation

Pick H Rowe and S Shahri together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Hucker and N Patel together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Hucker and K Gaging together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Hucker and J Penfold together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Kerr and O Bartlett together
Positive Correlation

Pick N Patel and K Gaging together
Positive Correlation

Pick N Patel and J Penfold together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Gaging and J Penfold together
Positive Correlation

Pick F Devonshire and J Watkin together
Negative Correlation

Pick F Devonshire and J Kerr together
Negative Correlation

Pick F Devonshire and O Bartlett together
Negative Correlation

Pick E McLeod and H Rowe together
Negative Correlation

Pick E McLeod and S Shahri together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Watkin and A Hucker together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Watkin and N Patel together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Watkin and K Gaging together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Watkin and J Penfold together
Negative Correlation

Pick H Rowe and A Hucker together
Negative Correlation

Pick H Rowe and J Penfold together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Shahri and A Hucker together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Shahri and J Penfold together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Hucker and J Kerr together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Hucker and O Bartlett together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Kerr and N Patel together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Kerr and K Gaging together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Kerr and J Penfold together
Negative Correlation

Pick N Patel and O Bartlett together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Gaging and O Bartlett together
Negative Correlation

Pick O Bartlett and J Penfold together
Negative Correlation

No data found

Best SOU-W Player Combinations

Best SOU-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

No data found

More on PL Labs

NOR-W vs SOU-W

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only